Carbon credits and carbon farming: IMPT's position
IMPT funds a tonne of verified carbon offset on every hotel booking. That same demand-side thinking is why we take carbon farming seriously — and why we have set out, honestly, what an officially-backed Irish tillage carbon credit could and could not pay.
This hub gathers IMPT's analysis of agricultural carbon credits with an Irish focus. It is thought-leadership, not a sales page. Each piece reuses only grounded, published figures and states the caveats plainly.
A shrinking sector that happens to be our lowest-emission farming
Irish tillage covers roughly 331,000 hectares (2026 BISS figures) and is falling by about 2% a year. It is the most carbon-efficient farming system we have, and the decline is a loss on both counts — for the growers whose margins no longer justify the rotation, and for the country's capacity to hold and remove carbon on productive land. The agronomy of the alternative is not in dispute. Teagasc has long promoted conservation or minimum tillage: shallow cultivation of 50–100mm, retaining at least 30% of crop residue on the surface, in place of the plough. What is missing is a financial reason for a grower to make the change and hold it, year after year.
The Catalonia precedent
Catalonia's regional government, through its Climate Change Office (OCCC), has run a government-backed voluntary “climate credit” system since 2015. It certifies credits from nature-based activity within the region — explicitly including agriculture and soil management — and sells them to companies meeting voluntary climate and corporate-responsibility commitments, with the funding directed into rural areas. IMPT has direct experience of that framework: a business connected to IMPT was certified into it in July 2026. The lesson worth passing on is not about the science, which is well established, but about the market: building corporate demand is the slow part, and it is the part an Irish scheme would have to plan for from the outset.
An EU standard now exists to certify against
At Union level, the Carbon Removal Certification Framework (CRCF), adopted in 2026, is the first EU-wide standard covering carbon farming and carbon removals, and agricultural soil carbon is in scope. That matters because it means an Irish credit need not invent its own rulebook or ask buyers to trust a private badge — it can certify against an official standard, which is exactly what corporate buyers now look for.
The economics, per hectare
The value of a credit per hectare is the sequestration rate multiplied by the carbon price. Both need to be stated honestly. Teagasc work indicates minimum tillage on its own sequesters roughly 0.3–0.7 tonnes of CO₂ per hectare per year; reaching the upper end, or beyond, requires the full package of cover crops, residue retention and reduced nitrogen. The 2.86 t/ha/yr figure quoted in some international meta-analyses derives from other climates and cropping systems and is not replicable in Irish conditions; it appears below only as a ceiling, not an expectation. Agricultural credits currently trade at roughly €45–68/t, with European regenerative-agriculture projects around €49–60/t and some EU agricultural land-management projects higher again; €50/t is used here as a mid-range working figure, not a fixed price.
| Carbon sequestered (t CO₂/ha/yr) | @ €40/t | @ €50/t | @ €60/t | @ €70/t | @ €80/t |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 — min-till, low end | €12 | €15 | €18 | €21 | €24 |
| 0.5 — realistic core | €20 | €25 | €30 | €35 | €40 |
| 0.7 — min-till, upper | €28 | €35 | €42 | €49 | €56 |
| 1.0 — full package | €40 | €50 | €60 | €70 | €80 |
| 1.5 — strong, fully stacked | €60 | €75 | €90 | €105 | €120 |
| 2.86 — international ceiling (not for Irish planning) | €114 | €143 | €172 | €200 | €229 |
A realistic planning figure is €25–40 per hectare per year for a genuine minimum-till and cover-crop system at a €50 price, with €60–120 achievable only where practice is strong, soils respond and the price holds. Over a five-year contract the realistic band is €150–300 per hectare, before savings.
How this connects to what IMPT already does
IMPT is a hotel-booking platform that funds one tonne of verified carbon offset on every booking, with access to more than eight million hotels and apartments across 195 countries. It runs a one-partner-per-territory model in which each partner earns a share of IMPT's booking margin and every booking carries that tonne of offset. In other words, IMPT already puts corporate and consumer money behind verified carbon — the same demand-side that an Irish Tillage Credit would need. An officially-backed domestic removal credit for tillage is a natural extension of that thinking: local, traceable and measured, rather than a distant offset of uncertain quality.
That is why IMPT takes the concept seriously and has set out the numbers honestly. Building the buyer side is the hard part, and it is the part IMPT understands from its own work in the Catalonia framework.
Questions & answers
Does IMPT sell an Irish tillage carbon credit?
No. This is analysis of a proposed concept. IMPT does not currently sell an Irish Tillage Credit and no such product exists for sale. IMPT's live product is a hotel-booking platform that funds one tonne of verified carbon offset on every booking.
What could an Irish tillage carbon credit realistically pay?
A realistic planning figure is roughly €25–40 per hectare per year for a genuine minimum-till and cover-crop system at a €50/t carbon price, rising toward €60–120 only with strong, fully-stacked practice. These are estimates, not guarantees.
What is carbon farming?
Carbon farming is the use of agricultural practices — such as reduced cultivation, cover crops and residue retention — that slow the loss of soil organic carbon and, over time, rebuild it. Verified additional carbon can be certified and sold as a credit.